You’ve been in the supermarket and seen the beleaguered
parent bugged by a child for a package of cookies. “No” is followed by asking
again, and whining, and asking yet again.
Illinois taxpayers are seeing this scene, only they are the parents
and state leaders the needy youngsters.
Voters already said “no” in November 2020 to replacing the
Illinois Constitution’s flat tax protection with a progressive state income
tax. They did so by a nearly 7 percentage point margin.
But some in Springfield are refusing to take “no” for an
answer.
The day after the proposal failed, Gov. J.B. Pritzker had
his spokesman claiming voters were deceived into rejecting the tax, despite the
$58 million of his own money he dumped into his failed campaign that claimed
taking another $3 billion from Illinois taxpayers was a “fair tax.”
Duped? More like adults deciding Pritzker & Co. needed
no more cookies – or rather denying them a way to consume taxes from different
income groups, including retirees, whenever they wanted.
And don’t forget that pols let slip exactly what the
progressive tax could lead to.
“One thing a progressive tax would do is make clear you can
have graduated rates when you are taxing retirement income,” Illinois Treasurer
Michael Frerichs said while speaking at an event hosted by the Des Plaines
Chamber of Commerce in 2020. “And, I think that’s something that’s worth
discussion.”
We also heard from indicted former Illinois House Speaker
Mike Madigan’s successor, Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch, when he let the
proposal resurface about three months after voters rejected it.
“We need to tell the taxpayers how we will spend this
money,” Welch said in February 2021 at the Economic Club of Chicago. “Tie
progressive tax(es) to paying off pension(s). Voters will trust us more.”
Which brings Illinois taxpayers to state leaders’ latest
refusal to listen. On the heels of giving themselves 18% raises in their base
pay, state lawmakers again are looking for that power to end the state’s flat
income tax of 4.95% and they expect voters to let them set whatever rates they
wish by targeting whatever income groups they wish.
It’s a progressive tax. They call it fair. And they are fine
with ignoring the “no” from voters.
The chief House sponsor for putting the progressive tax on
the ballot recently told Crain’s Chicago Business he is planning to bring it
back, maybe in a month, now that he’s a state senator.
“If you really believe in something, you don’t give up after
one loss,” state Sen. Robert Martwick, D-Chicago, said about reviving the plot.
“It’s the right thing to do.”
Right for state lawmakers who want ever more to spend, even
with a record $46 billion budget this year? Right for taxpayers who can only be
sure their taxes will never go down in Illinois?
Pritzker reacted: “That’s not something I am focused on this
session.” That’s far from telling Martwick to stand down, but maybe Pritzker is
getting the message?
Illinois lost a record 104,437 residents last year – the
ninth straight year of population loss. Losses are because people are moving
away. They’ve said they are moving away because of taxes, and for the better
job and housing markets lower-tax states offer.
Whether they are insistent, or deaf or just want what they
want regardless of the consequences, members of the new 103rd Illinois General
Assembly should not take their supermajority status for granted. They may get
what they want for now, but they also may get abandoned in the supermarket.